侵權(quán)法上純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失之救濟(jì)制度研究.pdf

1、侵權(quán)法上純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失之救濟(jì)制度研究 1 中文摘要 純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失問題一直是歐洲法研究的一個熱點問題，中國，無論是法學(xué)界還是司法界對這一問題的研究均不夠深入，許多學(xué)者對純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失概念都甚為陌生。目前，對純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失還沒有形成完整而清晰的定義，大多數(shù)國家對純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失的定義，都從反面角度入手，給予財產(chǎn)經(jīng)濟(jì)損失否定性的界定。 純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失是侵權(quán)法和合同法領(lǐng)域的一個交叉地帶， 鑒于純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失問題大多數(shù)是行為人對第三人的侵害， 因此在侵權(quán)法領(lǐng)

2、域中研究純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失的救濟(jì)制度比較合理。本文主要針對侵權(quán)法領(lǐng)域因過失引起的純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失的賠償問題，本文除引言與結(jié)論外，分四部分闡述。 第一部分純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失的基本理論問題。對純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失的概念進(jìn)行分析和界定，并概括出純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失的特征。然后把純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失與相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行辨析，著重討論了其與間接經(jīng)濟(jì)損失、履行利益、信賴?yán)嬷g的關(guān)系，再者基于以上分析，結(jié)合現(xiàn)行學(xué)說對純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失進(jìn)行分類。 第二部分是比較法視野下的純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失之救濟(jì)。 先對大陸

3、法系侵權(quán)法領(lǐng)域?qū)兇饨?jīng)濟(jì)損失賠償?shù)木葷?jì)制度進(jìn)行分析，大陸國家以德國、法國為代表，因此對德國和法國侵權(quán)法上的純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失的救濟(jì)制度進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的闡述。 接著對英美法系侵權(quán)法領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失賠償?shù)木葷?jì)制度進(jìn)行了分析，以英國和美國為代表進(jìn)行了闡述。通過比較法的考察，以此來借鑒國外先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗來彌補(bǔ)我國純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失救濟(jì)的不足之處。 第三部分是純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失在我國侵權(quán)法領(lǐng)域的救濟(jì)現(xiàn)狀。 首先分析了我國法律法規(guī)中有關(guān)純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失的規(guī)定，確定純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失

4、救濟(jì)的法律依據(jù)，并分析純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失救濟(jì)的可行性， 得出純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失納入我國法律體系是我國學(xué)理上和司法實踐中的共同要求。 第四部分我國侵權(quán)法上純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失之救濟(jì)制度的探討。 從純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失救濟(jì)途徑的選擇、 純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失賠償?shù)南薅?biāo)準(zhǔn)和類型化的研究為經(jīng)濟(jì)制度的完善提出了合理的建議。 關(guān)鍵詞：純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失；排除規(guī)則；注意義務(wù)；救濟(jì)模式 侵權(quán)法上純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)損失之救濟(jì)制度研究 1 ABSTRACT Pure economic loss has be

5、en a hot issue in the study of European law. In China, there is not enough study on the theorists and the judiciary .Many scholars are very strange to the pure economic loss. At present, the pure economic loss has not ye

6、t formed a complete and clear definition. Most countries have given a negative definition to the pure economic loss. Pure economic loss is a cross-zone of the field of tort law and contract law. It is more reasonable to

7、 research the problem in the field of tort law .Because the problem is mostly involved in affairs of the third person. In this paper, the author is mostly study the problem in the field of tort law. This paper comprises

8、four parts except to introduction and conclusion. There are the basic theoretical issues of the pure economic losses in the first part. The author defined the pure economic loss and summarized the characteristics of the

9、pure economic loss. The pure economic loss is compared with the other similar concepts such as indirect economic loss and performance interest. The author used the current doctrine of pure economic loss to classify the

10、 pure economic loss. The second part is comparatively introduces remedy system of the economic loss. At first, the author researched tort liability in the civil law system. There are French mode and Germany model in the

11、civil law system. The French mode and the Germany model are excellently set forth. Then the author researched tort liability in the common law system. There are Britain mode and American model in the common law system. T

12、he French mode and the Germany model are excellently set forth. We can use the advanced experience of other counties to deal with the issue of pure economic loss. The third part is the remedy status of pure economic loss

13、es in the area of tort law in China. The author introduced the laws and regulations of China relating to pure economic loss and determined the legal basis of pure economic loss. Then the author analyzed the feasibility o

14、f the pure economic loss remedies. The pure economic loss is introduced into our legal system to meet the requirements of the theorists and the judiciary. The fourth part is introduces our remedy system of pure economic

15、loss in China. The author selected the remedy system of pure economic loss in China. And the author limited the scope of the issue and typed the case of the pure economic loss. Key Words： Pure economic loss； Exclusion r