一項基于中國英語學(xué)習(xí)者語料庫的語義韻研究.pdf

1、南昌大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文一項基于中國英語學(xué)習(xí)者語料庫的語義韻研究姓名：張春萍申請學(xué)位級別：碩士專業(yè)：外國語言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語言學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：袁平華20071225AbstractTheconceptofsemanticprosodywasfhstmentionedbySinclairin1991HefoundOUtthat‘setin’washabituallyassociatedwithunple％manteventsandenjoyedcoll

2、ocatingwithbadwordslike‘rotdecay(：lccadenccs’s‘瑚”linguiststooktheconceptandproposedthataoBrtainwordhasitsownparticularcollocatingcategorywhichoftenconveysawritersorspeakersevaluatingmeanin90andanycollocatebeyonditmaysoun

3、dunnaturalThepresemstudyfocuses衄Chinese蛐hlearners’performancesofsemanticprosodyjnthefollowingfivenodes。icdevelopservehappenknowledgesodetyThelearnerstobestudiedareattwodifferentproficiencylevels：intermediateandadvancedAc

4、ontrastiveinterlanguageanalysis“m吣approachisadoptedinthestudyThreecompariso雌alemadeOncismadebetweenonesubcorpusofChinascLearners’EnglishCorpus(CI衛(wèi)qs1》rqnes衄tingintermediatelearners’proficiencylevelandBritishNationalCorpu

5、s刪嘞oneisbetweentheST3andtheothersubcorpusofCLEC，ST6representingadvancedlearners’proficiencylevel；thelastoneisbetweentheST6andBNCThroughthesecomparisonstheChines@jEnglishlearners’performancesofsemanticprosodyarerevealed抽t

6、ermsofquantitythedegreeofnativelikenessandappropriatenessThestudyshowsthatasfarastheconceptionofsemanticprosodyisconcerned；inthefirstcomparisontherearesomestrikingdifferencesbetweenST3andBNCinthefivenodes；inthesecond01]e

7、therecoexistsimilaritiesanddifference絡(luò)bd_rce缸ST3andST6；andinthethirdcomparisonbet3vfcllST6andBNC2nodesservehappenagreewithBNCasawholebuttherest3，nodes函Ⅳd踢knowledgesociety由notThefurtherinvestigationindicatesthatalthoughso

8、mesemanticgroupsofanodeproducedbyChmeseEnglishlearnersinST3andST6alealsosharedbyBNCtheyagedifferentjnpercentageSomesemanticgroupsareoverusedinwhichthecollocatesofagivenenjoyMIvaluesandTscoreswhilesomesouildcruslxlthatthe