大學生英語寫作在線自動評價的反饋研究——以句酷網(wǎng)為例_1042.pdf

1、I分類號：密級：無學校代碼：10414學號：2012010227碩士研究生學位論文碩士研究生學位論文AStudyonFeedbackinCollegeEnglishWritingBasedonAutomatedWritingEvaluationSystem————ACaseStudyofJuku大學生英語寫作在線自動評價的反饋研究大學生英語寫作在線自動評價的反饋研究————以句酷網(wǎng)為例以句酷網(wǎng)為例院所：教育學院導師姓名：劉春燕學科專業(yè)：

2、課程與教學論研究方向：英語教育學二○一五年六月IIIAbstractAutomatedwritingevaluation(AWE)programbasedoneducationaltechnologyautomaticallyprovidesassessmentfeedbacktostudents‘compositions.Suchwayofassessingcompositionsessayshasbecomethedirection

3、trendoffuturefeedbackresearch.Jukuasatooltoevaluationstudents‘writingabilitiesinthisstudyisoneofsuchsystems.PreviousstudiesonAWEhasgenerallycenteredonexaminingitsreliabilityvaliditycomparisonwithhumanratersparticipants‘f

4、eedbacksoon.ThepurposeofthisstudyistotakesJukuasanexampletodiscusstheeffectsofautomatedessayfeedbackonwritingdevelopmentofChinesecollegeEFLleaners.Thesubjectsinthisstudywere160EFLsophomes5Englishwritingteachersfromaunive

5、rsityinJiangxi.Bothquantitativequalitativeresearchmethodswereused:aquestionnaireasemistructuredinterviewstudents‘writingsamplesanalysis.Theresearchquestionsare:(1)whatisstudents‘a(chǎn)ttitudetowardstheusageofAWEJuku‘sfeedback

6、(2)Whatisteachers‘a(chǎn)ttitudetowardstheusageoftheAWE(3)WhateffectsdoesJuku‘sfeedbackhaveonlearners‘revisionofessaysonlearners‘writingaccuracydevelopmentTheresearchresultsrevealthatonthewholestudentsheldpositiveattitudestowa

7、rdtheintegrateduseofJuku.ItisfoundthatJuku‘sfeedbackismosthelpfulincheckinggrammarprovidingsuggestionsfwdusagerevisingmechanicsmistakes.Howeverthestudentsdonotrecognizethehelpfulnessofautomatedfeedbackincontentganization

8、.What‘smemostofthestudentsconsideredthatgradesgivenbytheprogramcannotreflecttheiractualEnglishwritingabilitytherevisionfeedbackgivenbyJukusometimesiswrong.Meoveramajityofstudentsinthisstudythoughttheautomatedfeedbackwasn

9、otspecificinfmativeenoughtoguidethemhowtorevisetheirwritings.Theteachers‘viewsonthepotentialofAWEcrectivefeedbackinhelpingstudentswithgrammarmechanicswerelargelypositivealthoughtheywerenotcompletelysatisfiedwiththequalit

10、yofthefeedback.Teachers‘jobontheganizationcontentissimplyirreplaceable.AsfthewritingaccuracyJukucancrectoverhalfofstudents‘errs(53.6%).Besideswealsofoundthatapproximately11.5%oftheJukufeedbackwaswrong.Theseinadequatefeed